Biopolitical Nomos and “Bare Life” in Arundhati Roy’s Novels

Khandakar Ashraful Islam

Noakhali Science and Technology University
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0176-4518


Abstract

Biopolitics—the maneuvers and stratagems employed to regulate, manage and govern people—is one of the most contested theoretical paradigms, which deals with the relation between state politics and human lives. While Foucault links the biopolitical nomos with the oppressive practices which render the human body docile, Giorgio Agamben sheds light on the new biopolitical nomos, which applying the most draconian means, subdue people within the law. According to Agamben, the arbitrary use of such sovereign power not only robs of the constitutional rights of the individuals but also denies their rights to live. Agamben observes that under the new biopolitical nomos each individual is exposed to the threat of being treated as a Homo Sacer, whose life can be taken with impunity. Focusing on Foucault’s concept of biopolitics and applying Agamben’s concepts like “state of exception” and Homo Sacer, the present paper investigates into Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things and The Ministry of Utmost Happiness to argue that in present-day India; the enactment of juridico-discursive power (communal riots, lynching, and violence to the lower caste) is not only denying the human rights of the minority groups but also exposing them to a “bare life.”


Acocella, Joan. 2017, June 5 & 12. Arundhati Roy Returns to Fiction, in Fury. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/06/05/arundhati-roy-returns-to-fiction-in-fury.

Agamben, G. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. USA: Stanford University Press.

Bose, B. 2017, July–September. A Fearless Antinovel. Review Biblio.

Das, S. 2001. The Nehru Years in Indian Politics: From A Historical Hindsight. Edinburgh Papers South Asian Studies 16:1: 2-35.

Foucault, M. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.

Foucault, M. 2003. Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the College De France 1975-76. London: Picador.

Ghosh, J. 2016. Indira Gandhi’s Call of Emergency and Press Censorship in India: The Ethical Parameters Revisited. Global Media Journal– Indian Edition 7:2: 1-15.

Ghoshal, S. 2017, June 6. The Ministry of Utmost Happiness By Arundhati Roy: A Far Cry from the Writer’s Brilliant First—The God of Small Things. Huffington Post India. https://www.huffingtonpost.in/2017/06/01/book-review-the-ministry-of-utmosthappiness- by-arundhati-roy_a_22121017/

Lemke, T. 2005. A Zone of Indistinction–A Critique of Giorgio Agamben’s Concept of Biopolitics. Outlines: Critical Social Studies 7:1: 3-13.

Manoj, S. 2017. Historicizing Fiction: Critiquing Contemporary India in Arundhati Roy’s The Ministry of Utmost Happiness. Journal of Literature & Aesthetics 17:1: 111-120.

Mandal, S. 2018. A Postcolonial Overview of Arundhati Roy’s The Ministry of Utmost Happiness. Postcolonial English Literature: Theory and Practice. India: Authorpress.

Michael, H. & Antonio, N. 2000. Empire. United States: Harvard University.

Minca, C. 2006. Giorgio Agamben and The New Biopolitical Nomos. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 88:4: 387-403, DOI: 10.1111/j.0435-3684.2006.00229.x.

Mishra, P. 2001, Feb. 11. There’ll Always Be an England in India. The New York Times Company. https://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/11/books/there-ll-always-be-an-england-in-india.html.

Nazari, F. & Hossein, P. 2013. Revisiting Colonial Legacy in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things. Journal of Educational and Social Research 3:1: 199-210, DOI: 10.5901/jesr.2013.v3n1p199.

Parfitt, T. 2009. Are the Third World Poor Homines Sacri? Biopolitics, Sovereignty, and Development. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 34:1: 41–58.

Passos, V. 2003. Micro-Universes and Situated Critical Theory: Postcolonial and Feminist Dialogues in a Comparative Study of Indo-English and Lusophone Women Writers. Diss. Utrecht.

Rabinow, P. & Nikolas, R. 2006. Biopower Today. Biosocieties 1:2: 195­217.

Ram, K. 2017. Entropic Fiction and its Narrative Strategy: A Perspective on The Ministry of Utmost Happiness. Journal of Literature & Aesthetics, 17:1: 91-99.

Roy, A. 1997. The God of Small Things. India: IndiaInk.

Roy, A. 2002, January 31. Shall We Leave it to the Experts. The Nation, https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/shall-we-leave-it-experts/

Roy, A. 2002, April 28. Democracy: Who is she when she’s at home? Outlook (India), http://www.sacw.net/Gujarat2002/arundhatiroyAug2002.html

Roy, A. 2010, September 11. Trickledown Revolution, Dawn, https://www.dawn.com/news/562271/the-trickledown-revolution-2

Roy, A. 2017. The Ministry of Utmost Happiness. India: Penguin Random House.

Sahadevan, P. 2013. Managing Internal Conflicts in India, Nepal, Sri Lanka and Myanmar: Strategies and Outcomes. Policy Choices in Internal Conflicts: Governing Systems and Outcomes. New Delhi.

Sumrain, M. & Shadi N. 2016. Postcolonial Places as Reconstructs of Colonial Culture: A Reading of Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities 12:1: 58-70.

Download

Published
2021-11-25


Islam, K. A. . (2021) “Biopolitical Nomos and ‘Bare Life’ in Arundhati Roy’s Novels”, Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies, (34), pp. 16–26. doi: 10.15290/10.15290/CR.2021.34.3.02.

Khandakar Ashraful Islam 
Noakhali Science and Technology University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0176-4518