Polish university students’ and recent graduates’ reflections on discussing controversial topics in American literature courses: a preliminary qualitative study
Marcelina Kalinowska
University of Białystok, PolandMarcelina Kalinowska holds a Master’s degree in Foreign Language Teaching, from the University of Białystok, Poland. Alongside her dedication to language education, she is interested in American literature, especially that of contemporary African-American authors. Her Master’s thesis on implementing critical pedagogy in American literature classes in Polish universities bridges these two areas of interest. Currently, she is a PhD student in the Doctoral School in the Humanities at the University of Białystok.
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1041-7295
Abstract
Exploring contentious subjects in literature courses can provide students with cognitive, social, and emotional benefits (Flynn & Rivera 2022; Rybakova et al. 2013). Hand and Levinson (2012) note that discussion is commonly considered as the most effective means to explore sensitive topics in the classroom. According to Flynn and Rivera (2022), teachers should seek appropriate pedagogical approaches to engage students in meaningful discussions on controversial issues. Critical pedagogy, most famously promoted by Paulo Freire, a Brazilian educator striving for social justice, may be useful in foreign literature classes to help create an inclusive environment for awareness-raising discussions on challenging topics, especially concerning social inequities and politics (Darder et al. 2009; Kincheloe 2008; McLaren 2009). This research explores Polish university students’ and recent graduates’ perceptions of discussing controversial topics in American literature classes. Written critical reflection prompts were administered to fifteen Polish university students and graduates to gather qualitative data, which were subsequently evaluated using content analysis. The study revealed that classroom discussions on sensitive issues can benefit Polish students, provided that American literature instructors remain impartial, promote inclusivity, and raise awareness of cultural and linguistic differences between Poland and the United States. In light of this, critical pedagogy is recommended as an effective approach to teaching controversial topics.
Keywords:
critical pedagogy, language teaching, higher education, American literature, contentious topics, Polish university students and graduates, critical reflectionsReferences
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. 1998. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Brookfield, S. 2009. The concept of critical reflection: promises and contradictions. European Journal of Social Work 12 (3): 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450902945215
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. R. B. 2007. Research Methods in Education. London/ New York: Routledge.
Darder, A., Baltodano, M. P., & Torres, R. D. 2009. Critical pedagogy: An introduction. In: A. Darder, M. P. Baltodano, & R. D. Torres (eds.), The Critical Pedagogy Reader. Second edition, 1-20. London/New York: Routledge.
Derince, Z. M. 2011. Language learning through critical pedagogy in a “Brave New World”. International Review of Education 57: 377–395.
Flynn, E., & Rivera, K. 2022. Don’t Avoid Controversial Literature: Your Students’ Psychological Health Depends on It. Education 142(3): 153–156.
Hand, M., & Levinson, R. 2012. Discussing Controversial Issues in the Classroom. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44(6): 614–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00732.x
Kincheloe, J. L. 2008. Critical Pedagogy Primer. Second edition. New York: Peter Lang.
McArthur, J. 2010. Achieving social justice within and through higher education: The challenge for critical pedagogy. Teaching in Higher Education 15(5): 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.491906
McLaren, P. 2009. Critical pedagogy: A look at the major concepts. In: A. Darder, M. P. Baltodano, & R. D. Torres (eds.), The Critical Pedagogy Reader. Second edition, 61–83. London/New York: Routledge.
Motta, S. C. 2013. Pedagogies of Possibility: In, against and beyond the Imperial Patriarchal Subjectivities of Higher Education. In: S. Cowden, & G. Singh, Acts of Knowing: Critical Pedagogy In, Against and Beyond the University (1st ed.). New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Ochieng, P. A. 2009. An analysis of the strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research paradigms. Problems of Education in the 21st Century 13: 13–18. https://scientiasocialis.lt/pec/node/files/pdf/Atieno_Vol.13.pdf
Rybakova, K., Piotrowski, A., & Harper, E. 2013. Teaching controversial young adult literature with the common core. The Wisconsin English Journal 55(1): 37–45.
Serrano, M. M., O’Brien, M., Roberts, K., & Whyte, D. 2017. Critical Pedagogy and assessment in higher education: The ideal of ‘authenticity’ in learning. Active Learning in Higher Education 19 (1): 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417723244
Shin, H., & Crookes, G. 2005. Exploring the possibilities for EFL critical pedagogy in Korea: A two-part case study. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies: An International Journal 2(2): 113–136. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427595cils0202_3
University of Białystok, Poland
Marcelina Kalinowska holds a Master’s degree in Foreign Language Teaching, from the University of Białystok, Poland. Alongside her dedication to language education, she is interested in American literature, especially that of contemporary African-American authors. Her Master’s thesis on implementing critical pedagogy in American literature classes in Polish universities bridges these two areas of interest. Currently, she is a PhD student in the Doctoral School in the Humanities at the University of Białystok.
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1041-7295
