Voluntary and involuntary memory in Samuel Beckett’s Krapp’s Last Tape

Jadwiga Uchman

University of Lodz


Abstract

Even though Krapp’s Last Tape presents a single character on the stage, it does not seem to adhere to the typical characteristics of a monodrama since, in fact, we become acquainted with three different Krapps. On the one hand, there is the 69-year-old Krapp visible on the stage, celebrating his birthday, and on the other, there are two more Krapps, who are not present physically, but only aurally – the first one existing as a voice on a recording made thirty years ago, and the second mentioned by the voice. These are his alter egos preserved on some tapes from the past. The drama presents the sameness and the change of Krapp over several years. At the same time, it deals with the concepts of voluntary and involuntary memory which are explained by Beckett in his Proust essay. The first kind of memory is dominated by a person’s will to preserve certain things for the future. The remembrances, thus saved, are static and do not change with the passage of time. The tapes indicate what Krapp decided to commemorate in the past. As the play progresses the clash between the past, as he wanted to remember it, and the past as he actually recalls it, becomes evident. The present Krapp does not recall certain things, which were of vital importance to the past Krapp. The dynamic interplay of voluntary and involuntary memory seems to be one of the most intriguing features of the drama.

Keywords:

Beckett, Krapp’s Last Tape, voluntary and involuntary memory

Aston, Elaine and George Savona. 1991. “Text in Performance.” Theatre as Sign System. A Semiotics of Text and Performance. London and New York: Routledge, 162-177.

Beckett, Samuel. 1987. Proust and Three Dialogues with George Duthuit. London: John Calder.

Beckett, Samuel. 1992. Samuel Beckett’s Theatrical Notebooks. Krapp’s Last Tape. Ed. James Knowlson. London: Faber and Faber.

Campbell, Sue Ellen. 1978. “Krapp’s Last Tape and Critical Theory.” Comparative Drama 12, 187-199.

Cohn, Ruby. 1973. Back to Beckett. Princeton, New Jersey: Grove Press Inc.: Princeton University Press 1973.

Harmon, Maurice, ed. 1998. No Author Better Served. The Correspondence of Samuel Beckett and Alan Schneider. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: Harvard University Press.

Knowlson, James. 1992. “Editorial Notes.” Samuel Beckett. Samuel Beckett’s Theatrical Notebooks. Krapp’s Last Tape. Ed. James Knowlson. London: Faber and Faber, 251-278.

Knowlson, James. 1976. “Krapp’s Last Tape: Evolution of a Play, 1958-75.” Journal of Beckett Studies 1, 50-65.

Knowlson, James. 1973. “Krapp’s Last Tape.” Frescoes of the Skull: the Later Prose and Drama of Samuel Beckett. Eds. James Knowlson and John Pilling. London: Calder.

Kozdon, Sabine. 2005. Memory in Samuel Beckett’s Plays. A Psychological Approach. Münster: Lit Verlag.

Lee, Vera. G. 1978. “Beckett on Proust.” Romanic Review 69, 196-206.

Libera, Antoni. 1988. “Przypisy i objaśnienia tłumacza.” Samuel Beckett. Dzieła dramatyczne. Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy, 609-754.

Morrison, Kristin. 1983. Canters and Chronicles: The Use of Narrative in the Plays of Samuel Beckett and Harold Pinter. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Worth, Katharine. 1999. Samuel Beckett’s Theater. Life Journeys. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Download

Published
2016-12-30


Uchman, J. (2016) “Voluntary and involuntary memory in Samuel Beckett’s Krapp’s Last Tape”, Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies, (15), pp. 10–18. doi: 10.15290/cr.2016.15.4.01.

Jadwiga Uchman 
University of Lodz