The TUNJO battery as a predictor of phonetic ability: A survey among English Philology students
Grażyna Gorbacz-Dailida
University of Białystok, PolandGrażyna Gorbacz-Dailida is a PhD student of Linguistics in the Doctoral School in the
Humanities at the University of Białystok. Her research interests include psycholinguistics,
cognitive learner individual differences, and suprasegmental phonetics.
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4710-7393
Abstract
Some learners are more successful in foreign language mastering than others. Among the plausible explanations discussed in the literature (Carroll 1981; Skehan 1991; Dörnyei 2005; Stansfield & Reed 2019; Griffiths & Soruç 2020), the concept of foreign language aptitude (FLA) is regarded as one of the key factors that can influence or predict learners’ success in the process of foreign language acquisition. The present pilot quantitative study aims to assess the extent to which learners’ level of foreign language aptitude can be correlated to their general phonological ability based on the example of first-year MA English Philology students (N=10). To assess the students’ level of aptitude, the Polish adaptation of the Modern Language Aptitude Test (MLAT), called the Test of Aptitude for the Learning of Foreign Languages (Test Uzdolnień do Nauki Języków Obcych – TUNJO), was used. On the other hand, to measure their level of phonetic ability, the test, which focused on several chosen areas covered during practical and theoretical phonetics classes during the BA programme, was constructed and submitted to the group. The quantitative data gathered throughout those two stages were subsequently analysed and interpreted. The results obtained revealed no significant correlation between the students’ level of aptitude and their general phonetic ability. Other individual differences and affective factors in language learning, alongside the structure of the measuring tools and the measurement itself, may justify the apparent lack of correlation.
Keywords:
foreign language aptitude, phonological ability, aptitude testing, achievement testing, correlational analysisReferences
Bachman, L. F. 1990. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baker Smemoe, W. & Haslam, N. 2013. The Effect of Language Learning Aptitude, Strategy Use and Learning Context on L2 Pronunciation Learning. Applied Linguistics 34(4): 435–456, https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams066
Carroll, J.B. & Sapon, S. 1959. Modern Language Aptitude Test. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
Carroll, J. B. 1965. The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training. In R. Glaser (ed.), Training, Research, and Education, 87−136. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Carroll, J. B. 1981. Twenty five years of research on foreign language aptitude. In K. C. Diller (ed.), Individual Differences and Individual Differences and Universals in Language Learning Aptitude, 83−118. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Carroll, J. 1991. Cognitive abilities in foreign language aptitude: then and now. In T. Parry and C. Stansfield (eds.), Language Aptitude Reconsidered, 11–29. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D., Goodwin, J. 2010. Teaching Pronunciation: A Course Book and Reference Guide. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Chapelle, C. 1988. Field independence: a source of language test variance? Language Testing 5(1): 62−82.
Dlaska, A. & Krekeler, C. 2008. Self-assessment of pronunciation. System 36(4): 506−516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.03.003.
Doughty, C., Campbell, S., Mislevy, M., Bunting, M., Bowles, A., & Koeth, J. 2010. Predicting near-native ability: The factor structure and reliability of Hi-LAB. In M. Prior et al. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 2008 Second Language Research Forum, 10–31. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Dörnyei, Z. 2001. Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dörnyei, Z. 2005. The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Ellis, R. 2004. Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. In A. Davies & C. Elder (eds.), The Handbook of Applied Linguistics, 525−551.Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. doi:10.1002/9780470757000.
Griffiths, C., & Soruç, A. 2020. Individual Differences in Language Learning. Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-52900-0.
Grigorenko, E. L., Sternberg, R. J., Ehrman, M. E. 2000. A theory-based approach to the measurement of foreign language learning ability: the CANAL-F theory and test. Modern Language Journal 84(3): 390−405.
Haslam, N.O. 2010. The Relationship of Three L2 Learning Factors with Pronunciation Proficiency: Language Aptitude, Strategy Use, and Learning Context. Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/2111
Horwitz, E. 2000. Teachers and students, students and teachers: an ever-evolving partnership. The Modern Language Journal 84: 523–535.
Hummel, K. M. 2009. Aptitude, phonological memory, and second language proficiency in nonnovice adult learners. Applied Psycholinguistics 30(02): 225. doi:10.1017/s0142716409090109
Kuliniak, R. 2002. Test Predyspozycji Językowych dla uczniów gimnazjum. Wałbrzych: Bimart.
Li, S. 2015. The Associations Between Language Aptitude and Second Language Grammar Acquisition: A Meta-Analytic Review of Five Decades of Research. Applied Linguistics 36(3): 385–408.
Li, S. 2016. The construct validity of language aptitude. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 38(04): 801–842. doi:10.1017/s027226311500042x (3), 385–408.
Meara, P. 2005. LLAMA Language Aptitude Tests. Swansea: Lognostics.
Pimsleur, P. 1966. Pimsleur Language Aptitude Battery (PLAB). New York: The Psychological Corporation.
Ponsonby, M. 1987. How Now, Brown Cow?: A Course in the Pronunciation of English, with Exercises and Dialogues. New York/London: Prentice Hall
Rosenthal, J. 1996. Teaching Science to Language Minority Students: Theory and Practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Rysiewicz, J. 2008. Measuring Foreign Language Learning Aptitude. Polish Adaptation of the Modern Language Aptitude Test by Carroll and Sapon. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistic: 44(4), 569−595.
Saito, K., Suzukida, Y., & Sun, H. 2019. Aptitude, Experience, and Second Language Pronunciation Proficiency Development in Classroom Settings: A Longitudinal Study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41(1): 201–225. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000432.
Skehan, P. 1991. Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13(02): 275−298.
Skehan, P. 2012. Language Aptitude. In A. Mackey & S.M. Gass (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, 381–395. London: Routledge.
Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. 2001. Aptitude for learning a foreign language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 21: 90−111. doi:10.1017/s026719050100006x.
Stansfield, C.W. & Hansen J. 1983. Field dependence-independence as a variable in second language cloze test performance. TESOL Quarterly 17, 29−38.
Stansfield, C.W. & Reed, D. J. 2019. The MLAT at 60 Years. In E. Wen, P. Skehan, A. Biedroń, S. Li, & R. Sparks (eds). Language Aptitude: Advancing Theory, Testing, Research and Practice. New York: Routledge.
Suzukida, Y. 2021. The Contribution of Individual Differences to L2 Pronunciation Learning: Insights from Research and Pedagogical Implications. RELC Journal 52(1): 48–61. doi:10.1177/0033688220987655.
Wen, Z. 2012. Foreign language aptitude. ELT Journal 66(2): 233–235. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr068
Wen, Z., Biedroń, A., & Skehan, P. 2017. Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Language Teaching 50(1): 1−31. doi:10.1017/S0261444816000276
Wojtowicz, M. 2006. Test Zdolności Językowych. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego.
Zeidner, M. 1987. A comparison of ethnic, sex and age bias in the predictive validity of English language aptitude tests: Some Israeli data. Language Testing 4(1): 55−71.
University of Białystok, Poland
Grażyna Gorbacz-Dailida is a PhD student of Linguistics in the Doctoral School in the
Humanities at the University of Białystok. Her research interests include psycholinguistics,
cognitive learner individual differences, and suprasegmental phonetics.
