ДИСТАНЦИОННОЕ ОБУЧЕНИЕ РУССКОМУ ЯЗЫКУ КАК ИНОСТРАННОМУ В УСЛОВИЯХ ПАНДЕМИИ КОРОНАВИРУСА (ПРЕИМУЩЕСТВА И НЕДОСТАТКИ)
Anna Romanik
Abstract
The object of interest of the present study is the teaching of Russian as a foreign language
in remote form during the pandemic period. The author has made it the aim of the article
to determine the advantages and disadvantages of distance learning Russian at a higher
education institution in Poland. The analysis was based on the experience and opinions
of the academic community of Russian philology at the University of Bialystok. The qualitative
empirical data were obtained from an interview with subjects participating in the
process of teaching and learning a foreign language – lecturers and students. The information
obtained highlights a number of problems hindering remote work in language education:
technical, methodological, psychological, as well as ethical troubles. Nevertheless, the
experience of the respondents also shows that online learning has many advantages, such
as increasing one’s own skills in operating educational platforms and programs, making
classes more attractive by using the latest digital technologies and interactive teaching
methods, etc.
Keywords:
Russian philology, Russian as a foreign language, pandemic, University of Bialystok, remote teachingReferences
Begalinov A.S., Aˇsilova M.S., Begalinova K.K., Ob obraze vysˇsego obrazovaniˆa v postkovidnu
ˆu `epohu: formirovanie razvitiˆa myˇsleniˆa novogo porˆadka, «Vestnik
NGPU» 2021, t. 11, s. 110–124.
Bˇziskaˆa ˆU.V., Petroviˇc M.P., Ispol’zovanie cifrovyh tehnologij pri obuˇcenii inostrannomu
ˆazyku, «Problemy sovremennogo pedagogiˇceskogo obrazovani ˆa» 2021,
71–1, s. 44–47.
Cekun O.A., Luˇ
snikova I.I., Sovremennye tehnologii v
obuˇ
cenii inostrannym ˆ
azykam cifrovogo
pokoleniˆa studentov, «Pedagogika i psihologi ˆa obrazovani ˆa» 2015, 1,
s. 69–73.
Davletova A.A., Alekseev O.A., Distancionnoe obuˇcenie, «Dosti ˇzeni ˆa nauki i obrazovani
ˆa» 2021, 1 (73), s. 35–38.
Dikova T., Distancionnoe obrazovanie v period pandemii: predvaritel’nye itogi (`elektronnoe
obuˇcenie russkomu ˆazyku kak inostrannomu v tehniˇceskom vuze), „Acta Polono-
-Ruthenica” 2021, XXVI/2, s. 121–126.
Ivanova E.E., Obrazovanie v udalennom dostupe: vzglˆady prepodavatelˆa, «Vestnik universiteta
» 2020, 8, s. 188–193.
Ju´ares-Diaz C., Perales M., Language Teachers’ Emergency Remote Teaching Experience
During the COVID-19 Confinement, “Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional
Development” vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 121–135.
Komilova M.M., Cifrovye tehnologii pri differencirovannom podhode k obuˇcenii uˇcaˆsihsˆa
russkomu ˆazyku kak inostrannomu, «Problemy nauki» 2021, 7 (164),
s. 27–32.
Mihułka K., Badania diagnostyczne w glottodydaktyce – zalety i trudności, „Neofilolog”
, nr 34, s. 183–194.
Moser K.M., Wei T., Brenner D., Remote teaching during COVID-19: Implications from
a national survey of language educators, “System” 2021, 97.
Narkuzieva G.Z., Distancionnoe obrazovanie: pl ˆusy i minusy, “Academic Research Educational
Science” 2021, vol. 2, issue 4, s. 1020–1025.
Ostapˇcenko G.S., Distancionnoe obuˇcenie v vuze v period pandemii: problemy i vozmoˇznye
riski, «Teori ˆa i praktika obˆsestvennogo razviti ˆa» 2021, 5 (159), [online],
https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/distantsionnoe-obuchenie-v-vuze-vperiod-
pandemii-problemy-i-vozmozhnye-riski, [dostup: 21.12.2021].
Paˇskovskaˆa S.S., Kak podstavit’ pleˇco, a ne podnoˇzku studentam vo vremˆa onlajn-obuˇceniˆa
russkomu ˆazyku kak inostrannomu, «Rusistika» 2021, t. 19, 1, s. 85–101.
Romaˇskina T.A., Danilova L.ˆU., Ispol’zovanie kaˇcestvennyh metodov nauˇcnyh issledovanij
v bibliotekie, Habarovsk 2014.
Strel’ˇcuk E.S., Perspektivy onlajn-obuˇceniˆa russkomu ˆazyku kak inostrannomu v vuzah RF,
«Rusistika» 2021, t. 19, 1, s. 102–115.
