From traditional classes to MOOCs – roles of language teachers
Iwona Mokwa-Tarnowska
Politechnika Gdańska, Centrum Języków ObcychAbstract
Intensive teacher support is the major factor in e-learning being an effective learning and teaching environment. Different teacher’s roles are associated with the specific nature of the online educational process, which results from the adopted educational paradigm, instructive or constructivist, the number of participants, the course structure together with its resources and activities, as well as the subject matter of the e-learning programme or module. The teacher responsible for developing and supervising a massive open online course has to perform more varied activities and tasks than that working with small groups participating in an e-learning or blended learning programme. In the first case their work involves mainly pre-emptive support, in the second one both pre-emptive and many-layered responsive. Therefore their duties may include helping students solve not only their academic problems, but also non-academic ones. The paper shows how teacher support impacts the effectiveness of teaching and learning English during e-learning courses and modules for groups of a limited and unlimited number of participants.
Keywords:
e-learning, MOOC, support, language teacher, foreign language teachingReferences
Bayne S., Ross J., The Pedagogy of the Massive Open Online Courses: the UK view, York 2013.
Can T., Learning and teaching languages online: A constructivist approach, „Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language)” 2009, 3(1), s. 60-74.
Clow D., MOOCs and the funnel of participation, [w:] Third Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK 2013), 8-12 April, Leuven, Belgium 2013.
Engle W., UBC MOOC pilot: Design and delivery overview, Vancouver 2014.
Grainger B., Massive open online course (MOOC) Report, London 2013.
Ho A.D. et al., HarvardX and MITx: The first year of open online courses. HarvardX and MITx Working Paper No. 1, 2014, [online], http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2381263, [dostęp: 26.08.2015].
Johnson G. M., Instructionism and constructivism, 2014, [online], http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED490726.pdf, [dostęp: 20.08.2015].
Kolowich S., Coursera takes a nuanced view of MOOC dropout rates. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 2013, [online], http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/coursera-takes-anuanced-view-of-mooc-dropout-rates/43341, [dostęp: 03.09.2015].
Li Yuan, Powell S., MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education: A white paper, Bolton 2013.
Mokwa-Tarnowska I., Support mechanisms in teaching technical writing in the online environment, [w:] International Language Teaching Conference: Seeking most effective methods at different levels – organisation, methodology, tools, M. Chomicz, B. Trela (red.), Warszawa 2008.
Mokwa-Tarnowska I., Struktury wsparcia a efektywność w środowisku e-learningowym, „E-mentor” 2014, 2(54).
Mokwa-Tarnowska I., E-learning i blended learning w nauczaniu akademickim: Zagadnienia metodyczne, Gdańsk 2015.
MOOC Teams, MOOCs @ Edinburgh 2013 – Report #1, Edinburgh 2013.
Parr C., Not staying the course, Times Higher Education, May 10, 2013, [online] http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/05/10/new-study-low-mooc-completion-rates#ixzz367oaskXQ, [dostęp: 03.09.2015].
Simpson O., Supporting students for success in online and distance education, New York 2012.
