The evaluation of a BA seminar based on the methodology of the ‘pear story’

Ewa Lewicka-Mroczek

Ewa Lewicka-Mroczek - Uniwersytet w Białymstoku, Wydział Filologiczny, Instytut Neofilologii

Edyta Wajda

Edyta Wajda - Uniwersytet w Białymstoku, Wydział Filologiczny, Instytut Neofilologii

Daniel Karczewski

Daniel Karczewski - Uniwersytet w Białymstoku, Wydział Filologiczny, Instytut Neofilologii


Abstract

The ‘pear story’ research involves a discourse analysis of oral retellings of the so-called ‘pear film’. The analysis of narratives has a long history in the field of linguistics. The ‘pear story’ methodology, however, is unique as it provides diverse opportunities both in experimental and theoretical areas. This article presents the results of a survey study on the effectiveness of the BA seminar course based on the ‘pear story’ methodology conducted among the participants of this seminar at the University of Białystok. The results of the research indicate that the seminar students under investigation perceive the programme of the course as very effective. The following problem areas were identified: the limitation of the methodology, an inadequate emphasis on the collaborative aspect of the programme, specific difficulties, such as finding relevant sources, transferring theoretical problems into empirical analysis and writing and editing problems.

Keywords:

„pear story”, BA seminar course, experimental research

Bartlett F.C., Remembering. A Study in Experimental and Social Sociology, Cambridge 1967.

Chmiel A., Mazur I., Percepcja filmu a ogólnoeuropejskie standardy audiodeskrypcji – polski wkład w projekt Pear Tree, „Przekładaniec” 2009, 2, s. 138-158.

Collaborative language learning and teaching, D. Nunan (red.), Cambridge 1992.

Dickinson L., Self-instruction in language learning, Cambridge 1987.

Dörney Z., Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methodologies, Oxford 2007.

Erbaugh M.S., Mandarin oral narratives compared with English: The Pear/Guava stories, „Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association” 1990, 25, s. 21-42.

Feiz P., Traveling through space in Persian and English: a comparative analysis of motion events in elicited narratives, „Language Sciences” 2011, 33, s. 401-416.

Holec H., Autonomy and foreign language learning, Oxford 1981.

Learner autonomy, teacher autonomy: Future directions, B. Sinclair, I. McGrath, T. Lamb (red.), Harlow 2000.

Łobocki M., Metody i techniki badań pedagogicznych, Kraków 2010.

Nunan D., The Learner-centred curriculum, Cambridge 1988.

Orero P., Three Different Receptions of the Same Film. The Pear Stories Project Applied to Audio Description, „European Journal of English Studies” 2008, 12 (2), s. 179-193.

Pavlenko A., Autobiographic Narratives as Data in Applied Linguistics, „Applied Linguistics” 2007, 28/2, s. 163-188.

Pilch T., Bauman T., Zasady badań pedagogicznych. Strategie ilościowe i jakościowe, Warszawa 2001.

Stewart J., A quantitative analysis of sign lengthening in American Sign Language, „Sign Language and Linguistics” 2014, 17(1), s. 82-101.

Tannen D., A Comparative Analysis of Oral Narrative Strategies: Athenian Greek and American English, [w:] The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production, W. Chafe (red.), Norwood 1980, s. 51-87.

The Pear Stories. Cognitive, Cultural and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production, W. Chafe (red.), Norwood 1980.

Toldova S., Bergelson M.B., Khudyakova M.V., Coreference in Russian Oral Movie Retellings (the Experience of Coreference Relations Annotation in “Russian CliPS” corpus). Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies: Proceedings of the International Conference, „Dialogue 2016” Moscow, 2016, June 1-4.

Wilczyńska W., Uczyć się czy być nauczanym? O autonomii w przyswajaniu języka obcego, Warszawa 1999.


Published
2018-12-30


Lewicka-Mroczek, E., Wajda, E. and Karczewski, D. (2018) “The evaluation of a BA seminar based on the methodology of the ‘pear story’”, Linguodidactica, 22, pp. 85–100. doi: 10.15290/lingdid.2018.22.05.

Ewa Lewicka-Mroczek 
Ewa Lewicka-Mroczek - Uniwersytet w Białymstoku, Wydział Filologiczny, Instytut Neofilologii
Edyta Wajda 
Edyta Wajda - Uniwersytet w Białymstoku, Wydział Filologiczny, Instytut Neofilologii
Daniel Karczewski 
Daniel Karczewski - Uniwersytet w Białymstoku, Wydział Filologiczny, Instytut Neofilologii