PHONETIC AND WORD-FORMATION BORROWINGS FROM OLD CHURCH SLAVONIC IN THE FIRST REDACTION OF BELARUSSIAN-LITHUANIAN CHRONICLES (BASED ON THE ACADEMIC CHRONICLE AND SUPRASL CHRONICLE)
Katarzyna Grabowska
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku Wydział Filologiczny, Katedra Językoznawstwa Porównawczego i Stosowanegohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0313-5205
Abstract
The subject of this article is an analysis of two 16th century monuments of Grand Duchy of Lithuania writing: the Academic Chronicle and the Suprasl Chronicle. They belong to the first Belarusian-Lithuanian redaction, which consists of three main parts: all-Ruthenian, Smolensk, and the Chronicle of the Grand Dukes of Lithuania – the first original work wholly written in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. The aim of the article is to single out in both chronicles Old Church Slavonic elements occurring on phonetic and word-formation levels. The analysis has revealed that in the oldest, all-Ruthenian part of both Old Church Slavonic works there are the most phonetic and word-formation features. However, they are also present in the other parts of the chronicles, in which Old Church Slavonic forms of all-Slavonic words and their Old Ruthenian equivalents appear parallelly. A number of prefixes and suffixes typical of the Old Church Slavonic language also confirm a strong link between these two chronicles and the writing tradition.
Keywords:
piśmiennictwo WKL, latopisy białorusko-litewskie, fonetyka, słowotwórstwo, cerkiewnosłowianizmyReferences
Alefirenko N.F., Staroslavânizmy v leksiko-frazeologičeskom kontinuume vostočnoslavânskih âzykov, [online], https://www.rastko.rs/filologija/zmss/arhiva/56-57/alefirenko.pdf, [dostęp 24.04.2019].
Bukatevič N.I., Savickaâ S.A., Usačeva L.Â., Istoričeskaâ grammatika russkogo âzyka, Kiev 1974.
Bulyka A.M., Žuraǔskì A.Ì., Kramko Ì.Ì., Gìstaryčnaâ marfalogìâ belaruskaj movy, Mìnsk 1979.
Gorskaâ S.A., Leksika. Frazeologiâ. Leksikografiâ. Praktikum, Grodno 2009.
Efimov A.I., Istoriâ russkogo literaturnogo âzyka, Moskva 1967.
Kopylenko M.M., Kal’ki grečeskogo proishoždeniâ v âzyke drevnerusskoj pisʹmennosti, „Vizantijskij vremennik” 1973, 34 (59), s. 141-150.
Rusanìvs’kij V.M., Džerela rozvitku shìdnoslov`âns’kih literaturnìh mov, Kiïv 1985.
Samotik L.T., Leksika sovremennogo russkogo âzyka. Učebnoe posobie, Moskva 2012.
Semânčuk A., Belaruska-lìtoǔskìâ letapìsy ì polʹskìâ hronìkì, Grodna 2000.
Sreznevskij I.I., Materìaly dlâ slovarâ drevne-russkago âzyka, t. 2., Sankt-Peterburg 1892.
Ulaŝik N.N., Polnoesobranie russkih letopisej, t. XXXV, Moskva 1980.
Uluhanov I.S., O âzyke Drevnej Rusi, Moskva 1972.
Fasmer M., Ètimologičeskij slovarʹ russkogo âzyka, Moskva 2004.
Čamâryckì V.A., Belaruskìâ letapìsy âk pomnìkì lìtaratury. Uznìknenne ì lìtaraturnaâ gìstoryâ peršyh zvodaǔ, Mìnsk 1969.
Čemerickij V.A., Rabota avtora pervogo belorussko-litovskogo svoda nad russkimi istočnikami, [w:] Letopisi i hroniki 1980. V.N. Tatiŝev i izučenie russkogo letopisaniâ, B.A. Rybakov (red.), Moskva 1981, s. 182-189.
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku Wydział Filologiczny, Katedra Językoznawstwa Porównawczego i Stosowanego https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0313-5205
