Pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of CLIL in primary school: A case study
Anna Czura
Anna Czura - Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Wydział Filologiczny, Instytut Filologii AngielskiejAda Anklewicz
Ada Anklewicz - IV Liceum Ogólnokształcące im. Stefana Żeromskiego we WrocławiuАннотация
With the intention of promoting plurilingualism, many European systems of education have adopted approaches that aim at integrating content and a foreign language in the subject classroom. In Poland, CLIL-type instruction is rather elitist since it is addressed mainly to the most gifted students of secondary schools. The objective of the pilot study presented in this article was to implement CLIL mathematics lessons in a state primary school in Poland and analyse the pupils’ and the teachers’ perceptions of implementing this new form of instruction. On the basis of semi-structured interviews conducted with the pupils it can be stated that despite the general dislike of mathematics, they held a positive view of this subject when taught in English. In the open-ended surveys, the teachers indicated that although CLIL appeared to be motivating for the pupils and contributed to the increase in certain aspects of their language competence, it failed to facilitate any progress in the content subject. Moreover, the teachers struggled with heavy workload and the lack of proper teaching and learning resources that could be readily applied in CLIL-based classes in primary school.
Ключевые слова:
primary school, attitudes, foreign language, mathematicsБиблиографические ссылки
Apsel C., Coping with CLIL: Dropouts from CLIL streams in Germany, „International CLIL Research Journal” 2012, 1/4, s. 47-56.
Bruton A., CLIL: Some of the reasons why... and why not, „System” 2013, 41/3, s. 587-597.
Coyle D., Developing CLIL: Towards a theory of practice. „Monograph” 2006, 6, s. 5-29.
Coyle D., Listening to learners: An investigation into ‘successful learning’ across CLIL contexts, „International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism” 2013, 16/3, s. 244-266.
Coyle D., Hood P., Marsh D., CLIL Content and Language Integrated Learning, Cambridge 2010.
Czura A., Kołodyńska A., CLIL instruction and oral communicative competence in a primary school setting, [w:] Cross-cultural perspectives on bilingualism and bilingual education, K. Ożańska-Ponikwia, B. Loranc-Paszylk (red.), Bielsko-Biała 2015, s. 123-153.
Czura A., Papaja K., Curricular models of CLIL education in Poland, „International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism” 2013, 16/3, s. 321-333.
Dalton-Puffer C., Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles?, „Annual Review of Applied Linguistics” 2011, 31, s. 182-204.
Dalton-Puffer C., Smit U., Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom discourse, Frankfurt – Vienna 2007.
Doiz A., Lasagabaster D., Sierra J.M., Giving voice to the students: What (de)motivates them in CLIL classes?, [w:] Motivation and foreign language learning: From theory to practice, D. Lasagabaster, A. Doiz, J.M. Sierra (red.), Amsterdam 2014, s. 117-138.
Dörnyei Z., Ushioda E., Teaching and Researching Motivation (2nd ed.), Harlow 2011.
Gardner R.C., Lambert W.E., Attitudes and motivation in second language learning, Rowley 1972.
Llinares A., Dafouz E., Content and language integrated programs in the Madrid region: Overview and research findings, [w:] CLIL in Spain: Implementation, Results and Teacher Training, D. Lasagabaster, Y.R. de Zarobe (red.), Newcastle 2010, s. 95-113.
Lucietto S., Writing materials for CLIL: A lost cause? „Folio” 2009, 13/1, s. 12-14.
Marsh D., Using Languages to Learn and Learning to Use Languages, Jyväskylä 2000.
Marsh D., CLIL/EMILE – The European Dimension: Actions, Trends and Foresight Potential, Brussels 2002.
Massler U., Primary CLIL and its stakeholders: What children, parents and teachers think of the potential merits and pitfalls of CLIL modules in primary teaching, „International CLIL Research Journal” 2012, s. 36-46, [online], http://www.icrj.eu/14/article4.html.
Mehisto P., Marsh D., Frigols M., Uncovering CLIL: Content and language integrated learning in bilingual and multilingual education, Oxford 2008.
Meyer O., Introducing the CLIL-Pyramid: Key Strategies and Principles for CLIL Planning and Teaching, [w:] Basic Issues in EFL Teaching, M. Eisenmann, T. Summer (red.), Heidelberg 2011, s. 295-313.
Novotná J., Hoffmannová M., CLIL and Mathematics education, [w:] Mathematics for living. The mathematics education into the 21st century project, A. Rogerson (red.), Jordan 2000, s. 226-230.
Otwinowska A., CLIL lessons in the upper-primary: The interplay of affective factors and CALP, [w:] Affectivity in second language acquisition, D. Gabryś-Barker, J. Bielska (red.), Bristol 2013, s. 211-225.
Otwinowska A., Foryś M., They learn the CLIL way, but do they like it? Affectivity and cognition in upper-primary CLIL classes, „International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism” 2017, 40/5, s. 457-480.
Pladevall-Ballester E., Exploring primary school CLIL perceptions in Catalonia: students’, teachers’ and parents’ opinions and expectations, „International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism” 2015, 18/1, s. 45-59.
Serra C., Assessing CLIL at primary school: A longitudinal study, „International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism” 2007, 10/5, s. 582-602.
Tejkalova L., Mathematics for language, language for Mathematics, „European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education” 2013, 1/10, s. 23-29.
Xanthou M., The impact of CLIL on L2 vocabulary development and content knowledge, „English Teaching: Practice and Critique” 2011, 10/4, s. 116-126.
Yamano Y., CLIL in a Japanese primary school: Exploring the potential of CLIL in a Japanese EFL context, „The International CLIL Research Journal” 2013, 2/1, s. 19-30.
Anna Czura - Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Wydział Filologiczny, Instytut Filologii Angielskiej
Ada Anklewicz - IV Liceum Ogólnokształcące im. Stefana Żeromskiego we Wrocławiu
