Dramatization Strategies in “Ulysses” by James Joyce
Paweł Kozłowski
a:1:{s:5:"pl_PL";s:10:"AP Słupsk";}Abstract
The article indicates that James Joyce stylizes his novel Ulysses for a drama, and gives a comprehensive analysis of some narrative techniques used in the work. Referring to the most important, narratologically-oriented studies of Ulysses, the author states that limiting the narrator's competences turns out to be the basic strategy for dramatizing the novel. This assertion leads to the conclusion which has been so far overlooked in the Polish and Anglophone criticism. Using the comparative method, the author draws attention to the specifically dramatic conventions of dialogue transposed into Ulysses. These are devices known from the works of eminent playwrights of modernity, especially Ibsen, Strindberg, Maeterlinck and Chekhov.
Keywords:
dramaturgy, comparative studies, Joyce, literary theory and historyReferences
Adler Thomas (1980–1981), The Mirror as Stage Prop in Modern Drama, „Comparative
Drama”, Vol. 14, No. 4, s. 355–373.
Bazarnik Katarzyna [red.] (2002), Od Joyce’a do liberatury, Kraków: Universitas.
Benstock Bernard (1974), What Stephen Says: Joyce’s Second Portrait of the Artist,
w: „Ulysses” cinquante ans apres: Temoignages franco-anglais sur le chef d’oeuvre
de James Joyce, ed. L. Bonnerot, Paris: Didier, s. 137–152.
Boheemen Christine van [ed.] (1989), Joyce, Modernity, and Its Mediation, Amsterdam:
Rodopi.
Bowers Katherine (2008), The Three-Dimensional Heroine: The Intertextual Relationship
between Three Sisters and Hedda Gabler, „Studies in Slavic Cultures”, No. 7, s. 9–27.
Cabrera Maria (1996), Ulysses and Heterglossia: a Bakhtinian Reading of the „Nausicaa”
Episode, „Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses”, No. 9, s. 33–44.
Callaghan Sheilla (2008), Dead City: A Modern Riff on Joyce’s Ulysses, New York: Samuel
French.
Crowley Ronan (2010), Fusing the Elements of „Circe”: From Compositional to Textual
Repetition, „James Joyce Quarterly”, Vol. 47, No. 3, s. 341–361.
Czaplejewicz Eugeniusz (1977), Wstęp do poetyki pragmatycznej, Warszawa: Wydawnictwa
Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Erzgraber Willy (2002), Oral and Written Discourse as Mirrored in Experimental Narrative
Art, Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Evelein Johannes (1998), Drama Turning Inward: Strindberg’s Station Play and its Expressionist
Continuum, „Tijdschrift voor Skandinavistiek”, Vol. 19, No. 1, s. 163–184.
Feroza Khalid (2013), Critical Review of Ibsen’s Female Character Hedda Gabler, „International
Review of Social Sciences and Humanities”, Vol. 6, No. 1, s. 5–11.
Filipova Kalina (2007), Dramatized Narration: The Development of Joyce’s Narrative Technique
from „Stephen Hero” to „Ulysses”, Sofia: St. Kliment Ohridski University
Press.
Fludernik Monika (1986), The Dialogic Imagination of Joyce: Form and Function of Dialogue
in Ulysses, „Style”, Vol. 20, No. 1, s. 42–57.
Flynn Catherine (2011), A Brechtian Epic on Eccles Street: Matter, Meaning, and History
in „Ithaca”, „Eire-Ireland”, Vol. 46, No. 1–2, s. 66–86.
Gabler Hans (2005), The Rocky Road To Ulysses, Dublin: National Library of Ireland.
Gaedtke Andrew (2011), James Joyce as Philosopher and Theologian of Time, „Journal of
Modern Literature”, Vol. 34, No. 2, s. 192–195.
Garver Lee (1995), Shaw and Joyce: „The Last Word in Stolentelling”, „Modernism/
Modernity”, Vol. 2, No. 3, s. 179–180.
Genette Gerrard (1980), Narrative Discourse. An Essay in Method, New York: Cornell
University Press.
Gibson Andrew (2013), Thinking Forwards, Turning Back: Joyce’s Writings 1898–1903,
w: James Joyce in the Nineteenth Century, ed. J. Nash, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, s. 61–74.
Gilbert Stuart (1952), James Joyce’s Ulysses, New York: Vintage.
Gillespie Michael (2008), Party Pieces: Oral Storytelling and Social Performance in Joyce
and Beckett (review), „James Joyce Quarterly”, Vol. 45, No. 1, s. 157–160.
Grandt J ¨urgen (2003), „Might be what you like, till you hear the words”: Joyce in Zurich
and the Contrapuntal Language of Ulysses, „Joyce Studies Annual” Vol. 14, s. 74–91.
Groden Michael (1997), Ulysses in Progress, Pirnceton: Princeton University Press.
Harris Susan (2001), James Joyce after Postcolonialism, „MFS Modern Fiction Studies”,
Vol. 47, No. 4, s. 1004–1008.
Hart Michael (1995), The Subaltern Ulysses, „Modernism/Modernity”, Vol. 24, No. 3,
s. 182–183.
Henderson Diana (1989), Joyce’s Modernist Woman: Whose Last Word?, „MFS Modern
Fiction Studies”, Vol. 35, No. 3, s. 517–528.
Hellweg John, Hellweg Susan (1982), The sea gull: A communicative analysis of Chekhovian
drama, „Communication Quarterly”, Vol. 30, No. 2, s. 150–154.
Holquist Michael [ed.] (1981), The Dialogical Imagination. Four Essays by M.M. Bakhtin,
London: University of Texas Press.
Johnson Jeri (2004), Joyce and Feminism, w: The Cambridge Companion to Joyce, ed. D. Attridge,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 196–212.
Joyce James (1975), Ulisses, przeł. M. Słomczyński, Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut
Wydawniczy.
Kelly Dermot (1988), Narrative Strategies in Joyce’s Ulysses, London: UMI Research
Press.
Kennedy Andrew (1983), Dramatic Dialogue. The duologue of personal encounter, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Kenner Hugh (1978), Joyce’s Voices, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Klitg˚ard Ida (2004), Dual Voice and Dual Style: Translating Free Indirect Discourse in Ulysses,
„Nordic Journal of English Studies”, Vol. 3, No. 3, s. 319–345.
Kosiński Dariusz (2009), Między ciałem a głosem. Głos w dramacie, w: Elementy dramatu:
analizy diagnostyczne, red. M. Borowski, M. Sugiera, Kraków: Księgarnia
Akademicka, s. 165–185.
Krasner Dawid (2012), A History of Modern Drama, Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell.
Lawrence Karen (1981), The Odyssey of Style in Ulysses, Princeton: Princeton University
Press.
Lin Paul (2001), Standing the Empire: Drinking, Masculinity, and Modernity in „Counterparts”,
„European Joyce Studies”, No. 10, s. 33–57.
Malkin Jeanette (1999), Memory-Theatre and Post-modern Drama, Michigan: University
of Michigan Press.
Marshall Needleman (2002), Voices and Values in Joyce’s Ulysses (review), „Criticism”,
Vol. 44, No. 1, s. 111–114.
McHale Bryan (1992), Constructing Postmodernism, London: Routledge.
Norris Margot (2007), Possible-World’s Theory and Joyce’s „Wandering Rocks”: The Case
of Father Conmee, „Joyce Studies Annual”, Vol. 15, s. 21–43.
O’Brien Alyssa (2000), The Molly Bloom’s of Penelope: Reading Joyce Archivally, „Journal
of Modern Literature”, Vol. 24, No. 1, s. 7–24.
Ochshorn Kathleen (2005), Who’s Modern Now: Shaw, Joyce and Ibsen’s When We Dead
Awaken, „Shaw. The Annual of Bernard Shaw Studies”, No. 25, s. 96–104.
Paszek Jerzy (1984), Sztuka aluzji literackiej, Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu
Śląskiego.
Paziński Piotr (2005), Labirynt i drzewo, Kraków: Austeria.
Pleśniarowicz Krzysztof (1996), Przestrzenie deziluzji. Współczesne modele dzieła teatralnego,
Kraków: Universitas.
Russell Susan (2005), Space and Time in Epic Theater: The Brechtian Legacy (review),
„Theatre Journal” 2005, Vol. 57, No. 1, s. 131–132.
Sailer Susan (1997), James Joyce and the Art of Mediation (review), „MFS Modern Fiction
Studies”, Vol. 43, No. 2, s. 513–515.
Sajewska Dorota (2004), Zapis na wstędze nieświadomości. O dramacie Jana Augusta Kisielewskiego
„W Sieci”, w: Dialog w dramacie, red. W. Baluch, L. Czartoryska-Górska,
M. Żółkoś, Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka, s. 15–28.
Schwarz Daniel (1989), Joyce, Bakhtin and Popular Culture: Chronicles of Disorder, and:
Missed Understandings: A Study of Stage Adaptations of the Works of James Joyce
(review), „MFS Modern Fiction Studies”, Vol. 35, No. 4, s. 798–800.
Shea Daniel (2006), James Joyce and Mythology of Modernism, Stuttgart: Verlag.
Sławińska Irena (1988), Odczytywanie dramatu, Warszawa: PWN.
Sinko Grzegorz (1977), Kryzys języka w dramacie współczesnym. Rzeczywistość czy złudzenie?,
Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.
Sofer Andrew (2003), The Stage Life of Props, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Somer John (1994), The Self-Reflexive Arranger in the Initial Style of Joyce’s Ulysses, „James
Joyce Quarterly”, Vol. 31, No. 2, s. 65–79.
Spurr David (2002), Joyce and the Scene of Modernity, Florida: University Press of Florida.
Strindberg August (1977), Przedmowa do Panny Julii, w: tegoż, Wybór dramatów, przeł.
Z. Łanowski, Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.
Strzetelski Jerzy (1975), James Joyce – twórca nowoczesnej powieści, Warszawa: PWN.
Świontek Sławomir (1999), Dialog – dramat – metateatr. Z problemów teorii tekstu dramatycznego,
Warszawa: Errata.
Terence Patrick (2007), Monitored Speech: The „Equivalence” Relation between Direct and
Indirect Speech in Jane Austin and James Joyce, „Narrative”, Vol. 15, No. 1, s. 24–39.
Thresher Tanya (2008), Vinløv i h˚aret”: The Relationship between Women, Language and
Power in Ibsen’s Hedda Gabler, „Modern Drama”, Vol. 51, No. 1, s. 73–83.
Thwaites Tony (2010), Mr. Bloom, Inside and Out: Some Topologies of the „Initial Style”
of Ulysses, „James Joyce Quarterly”, Vol. 47, No. 3, s. 363–381.
Tornqvist Egil, Steene Brigitta (2007), Strindberg on Drama and Theatre. A Source Book,
Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Waligóra Jerzy (2004), Młodopolski „dramat wewnętrzny”: przejawy podmiotowości i subiektywizacji
w wybranych utworach dramatycznych, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Naukowe
Akademii Pedagogicznej w Krakowie.
Walkiewicz Edward (2010), Joyce, Imperialism and Postcolonialism, „English Literature
in Transition”, Vol. 53, No. 4, s. 509–513.
Wąchocka Ewa (1999), Autor i dramat, Katowice: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu
Śląskiego.
White Sian (2009), „O, despise not my youth!”: Senses, Sympathy, and an Intimate Aesthetics
in Ulysses, „Texas Studies in Literature and Language”, Vol. 51, No. 4,
s. 503–536.
Wilkinson Lynn (2001–2002), Maurice Maeterlinck and the Making of Modern Theatre
(review), „Nineteenth-Century French Studies”, Vol. 30, No. 1–2, s. 203–205.
Udalska Eleonora (2010), Nowe monologi we współczesnym teatrze i dramacie, w: Dramatyczność
i dialogowość w kulturze, red. A. Krajewska, D. Ulicka, P. Dobrowolski,
Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, s. 153–162.
a:1:{s:5:"pl_PL";s:10:"AP Słupsk";}
License
Articles published on the platform of Białostockie Studia Literaturoznawcze are available under the license CC-BY-SA 4.0 (CC Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0).
All interested parties have access to the published articles under the following conditions:
1.They must acknowledge authorship, which means crediting the author, title, source, together with the disseminated work (including the hyperlinks to the original work and doi) as well as the same license under the same conditions.
2. Derivative works can be distributed only under the same license as the original work.
The University of Białystok retains the right to the entire journal (layout, graphic design, title, cover design, logo, etc.).
The author retains the property right but confers on the University of Białystok the right to use the work.