Speaking on Sex/Gender in a Non-dualizing Way: Preliminary Remarks

Marzenna Cyzman-Eid

Institut of Literary Studies. Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5530-2351


Abstract

The article analyzes Judith Butlers discourse on sex/gender and refers to the philosophical concept of the non-dualizing mode of speaking proposed by the Austrian philosopher Josef Mitterer. In the opinion of the author, Butler non-intentionally seems to use the non-dualizing rhetoric when discussing sex/gender differentiation, especially when she considers the performative understanding of gender. According to the non-dualizing logic, there is no difference between sex and gender for both are the product of social and cultural practices. Sex, gender, femininity are notions which are not stable, constant and coherent. They cannot be treated as objective and independent from the discourse. The conclusions coming from both conceptions may have significant pragmatic consequences in social and political practices, allowing formulation of less oppressive statements on sex/gender.

Keywords:

sex, gender, non-dualizing mode of speaking, discourse, Josef Mitterer, Judith Butler

Butler Jugith (1990), Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, New York: Routledge.

Butler Judith (1993), Bodies that Matter. On the Discursive Limits of “Sex”, New York: Routledge.

Cyzman Marzenna (2013), Ile jest Fisha w Fishu? Pytania na marginesie Stanleya Fisha „Profesjonalnej poprawności”, „Teksty Drugie”, nr 5, s. 293–310.

Cyzman Marzenna (2015), Nieznośna płynność rzeczy. Dyskurs, retoryka, interpretacja w nie-dualizującym sposobie mówienia, Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UMK.

Cyzman Marzenna (2017), On the Non-Dualizing Rhetoric. Some Preliminary Remarks, w: Realism – Relativism – Constructivism. Proceedings of the 38th International Wittgenstein Symposium in Kirchberg, ed. Ch. Kanzian, S. Kletzl, J. Mitterer, K. Neges,

Series: Publications of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society – New Series 24, Berlin: De Gruyter, s. 17–30.

Derra Aleksandra (2008), Non-dualizing Way of Speaking and the Female Subjectivity Problem, „Constructivist Foundations”, Vol. 3, No. 3, special issue: The Non-dualizing Philosophy of Josef Mitterer, eds. A. Riegler, S. Weber, s. 208–213.

Fish Stanley (2008), Interpretacja, retoryka, polityka. Eseje wybrane, red. A. Szahaj, przeł. K. Abriszewski i in., Kraków: Universitas.

Glasersfeld Ernst von (1984), An introduction to radical constructivism, w: The Invented Reality: How Do We Know What We Believe We Know? (Contributions to Constructivism), ed. P. Watzlawick, New York: Norton, s. 17–40; http://www.vonglasers

feld.com/070.1.

Glasersfeld Ernst von (1996), Radical Constructivism. A Way of Knowing and Learning, London: Falmer Press.

Maturana Humberto, Varela Francusco (1980), Autopoiesis and Cognition. The Realization of the Living, Dordrecht – Boston – London: D. Ridel Publishing Company.

Mitterer Josef (1996), Tamta strona filozofii. Przeciwko dualistycznej zasadzie poznania, przeł. M. Łukasiewicz, Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.

Mitterer Josef (2004), Ucieczka z dowolności, przeł. A. Zeidler-Janiszewska, Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.

Mitterer Josef (2008), (Radical) Constructivism – What Difference Does It Make?, „Constructivist Foundations”, Vol. 3, No. 3, special issue: The Non-dualizing Philosophy of Josef Mitterer, eds. A. Riegler, S. Weber, s. 160–162.

Mitterer Josef (2013), On Interpretation, „Constructivist Foundations”, Vol. 8, No. 2, special issue: Non-dualism. A Conceptual Revision?, eds. A. Riegler, S. Weber, s. 143–147.

Mitterer Josef (2013), Paradoksy Nowego. O płynnym stanie rzeczy, przeł. B. Balicki, „Przegląd Kulturoznawczy”, nr 1 (15), s. 21–29.

Schmidt Siegfried (2011), From Objects to Processes. A Proposal to Rewrite Radical Constructivism, „Constructivist Foundations”, Vol. 7, No. 1, s. 1–9.

Skibiński Adam (2003), Homo Significus. Autorozprawa o poznaniu – języku, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Imex-Graf.

Weiss Martin (2008), Non-dualistic Sex. Josef Mitterer’s Non-dualistic Philosophy in the Light of Judith Butler’s (De)Constructivist Feminism, „Constructivist Foundations”, Vol. 3, No. 3, special issue: The Non-dualizing Philosophy of Josef Mitterer, eds. A. Riegler, S. Weber, s. 183–189.


Published
2024-03-30



Marzenna Cyzman-Eid 
Institut of Literary Studies. Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5530-2351



License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Articles published on the platform of Białostockie Studia Literaturoznawcze are available  under the license CC-BY-SA 4.0 (CC Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0).

All interested parties have access to the published articles under the following conditions:

1.They must acknowledge authorship, which means crediting the author, title, source, together with the disseminated work (including the hyperlinks to the original work and doi) as well as the same license under the same conditions.

2. Derivative works can be distributed only under the same license as the original work.

The University of Białystok retains the right to the entire journal (layout, graphic design, title, cover design, logo, etc.).

The author retains the property right but confers on the University of Białystok the right to use the work.